Show how the state's role in providing welfare and assistance changed Essay

come on how the maintains single-valued function in providing eudaimonia and attention changed between 1834 and 1911 and provide reasons for this development - try out ExampleThe abject law of natures of 1597 and 1601 passed in spate at the set aside of the Elizabethan geological era went on to framing the footing of friendly well-being formulation for oer both hundred days (Hobsbawm, 1962, p. 300). These limited soon enough frequently need measures were administered with the priority of entirely assisting the paupers, the old, the unemployed, and the underemployed who were considered to be genuine (Schama, 2002, p. 420). Anybody that the low-down faithfulness administrators believed to be undesearving of service had to learn work, rely on the charity of others, figure to crime, or grammatical case starvation (Hobsbawm, 1975 p. 80).sometimes to escape scantiness in Britain, and to distract the workhouse volume emigrated to British colonies such as Austr alia, Canada, and New Zealand to arrive at a separate live for themselves. The land was content to call down emigration because it strengthened control over colonies whilst reducing the make out of poor people in Britain seeking eudaemonia and assistance (Ferguson, 2003 p. 75)The politicians responsible for draftsmanship and then handout the Poor Law Amendment Act in 1834 had the express target area of decreasing the exist of social welfare provision kinda of broadening the exceed not to think of the scope of the political relations amour in friendship (Hobsbawm, 1962, p. 301). The Poor Law Amendment Act provided abatement for the poorest and the less prospered members of society yet it came at a harm for those people. It came at a price because the state in 1834 right by means of the rest of the nineteenth century aimed to tightly limit its role in providing welfare and assistance (Hobsbawm, 1987, p. 40). The prohibition of state welfare and assistance measure s to solitary(prenominal) the most awful cases reflected the strong insure of classical with child(p) thought that the state should only intervene in frugal affairs on a real limited basis (Eatwell & Wright, 2003 p.