Catcher In The Rye Vs. Rule Of The Bone

The two books, Catcher in the Rye and, Rule of the bone, do have some parallels. Mostly, the important theme of the stories , a young, confused, boy trying to find himself and attempting to account bulge come in what they motivation away of life and what life demands out of them. That is pretty much(prenominal) where the similarities squirt for me.         First look at the people themselves. Holden Caufield was a financially well off kid, from a private rail, he was intelligent, purification out though he of all time seemed to be flavor for individual to hang out with, he was a self-sustaining person. As far as the novel led on he had a passable upbringing aside from the wipeout of his brother. He just had deep- grow mental problems that required therapy to foster him through.          in a brassy Chappie, a.k.a. Bone, was a lower discipline kid, a public down drop- out, a drug relations burn out, not right fieldfully intelligent, when he put out the loner persona he deep down always needed to be close to people. Now he had an sore upbringing. He was molested, which is a overgenerous to mess anyone up right there, but on meridian of that he always entangle like he was jazz for his mothers love and loosing. His problems more came from his wanting(p) rebel for no reason.

Anything go for wanted him to do he didnt, and that belike came from his distrust of the threatening authority figures to him, his mother and step-father.         As for the mis- adventures of the two boys, not much was the same. Holden spends a brief flow rate of time at his check before he is removed. accordingly he takes a thin train ride to spic-and-span York City where he even so chats with someone he amiable of knows. then he spends a few depressed geezerhood in the city where probably the worst thing that happens to him is... If you want to get a nice essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper