Critical Analysis of "Love Is Not All".

tell apart is More Than Meat and Drink This sonnet attempts to carry on to the reader that respect is non concrete, though it is necessary for life and puff up being. It investigates situations of anguish and misfortune and find n single where enjoy would come across both difference. possess along Is non entirely, explains that revere is not a necessity, still that its absence will cause a objet dart to pull through closer to death. Love is not an object, an act, a spirit, or a thought; it is a silent motivater of life. From Love Is Not All, we can gather that erotic hit the sack is intangible, respectable, and helpful to only if a mans soul. The ogdoad only gives us one perspective, but gives one important fact at its end. Love may flummox our lives. We are told that the lack of love may withdraw to death. Love is a necessity for life; therefore, it is only of grandness to a mans soul. This is proved by examples that give settings where a tangible operator would be of assistance, but love would not. Love is not a food or drink. It cannot guard against the rain, or make needless drowning men. It cannot bring life to those that are dead nor repair a broken bone. Even though love may be intangible, and seem unimportant at times, it is essential for life. The sestet gives a different perspective, showing the authors value of love, and the lengths the writer would go to, to part with up it. The sestet adds a new idea to the sonnet, that leaves us with validation that love is more than meat or drink, although it is neither. The writer resists barter anything for love, showing how much it is of value to him. Love is effectual because the writer refuses to peck anything in place of it. The writer refuses to transfer love for peace, so far if he were in peak pain, or even if it were against his past resolutions to do so.

He is in addition tempted to divvy up his memories of a night for food. It well may be that he office trade these things for love, but the last rake comforts us in saying that he does not think he would. It is predictable for the writer to not trade love for these factors, since he wrote in the octet that the lack of love would lead to death. The writer then, unintentionally proves the last point make in the octet by having the sestet prove he would sell love for nothing. The writer would dare not trade love, in apprehension that the loss of love would cause death. Love is intangible and the lack of love would lead to death. Even if tempted by pleasurable things, no sensible man would trade love for something other. Love is a powerful spi rit of life. If you want to get a full essay, read it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper