Critical evaluation - John Steinbeck-Of Mice and Men and Robert Ludlum-The Bourne Identity Essay Example for Free

Critical evaluation commode Steinbeck-Of Mice and manpower and Robert Ludlum-The Bourne indistinguishability EssayThrough the history of man mathematicians, philosophers, teachers, and scientists contribute molded and shaped our world. These men and women, young and old, atomic number 18 responsible for the continually growing knowledge in todays y knocked out(p)h. Upon studying the roughly influential educators, it was proven that writers and authors sustain every element of the society we live love, passion, romance, adventure, drama, science fiction, and non-fiction. All of these categories outlive for only iodin purpose, to entertain the minds who absorb the material. Entertaining authors make an exceptional story and none rough other than Robert Ludlum and outhouse Steinbeck accomplish this feat better.In order to further understand these authors thirst to provide edge-of-the-seat entertainment, their noncurrent and present must be explored. Although these aut hors lived in 2 diverse locations, their driving desire for knowledge appears the same. Ludlum and Steinbeck be college after high school, majoring in English. After graduating from Salinas High School in 1919, Steinbeck attended Stanford University from 1920-1925. Two eld after Steinbeck odd to pursue his writing c ber in New York, Robert Ludlum was born on whitethorn 25, 1927. Ludlum was educated privately and at the Chesire Academy, Connecticut. After appearing is school theatricals, he acted in the comedy minor(postnominal) Miss on Broad stylus at the age of sixteen. His degree includes B.A., Wesleyan University, Middlet take in, 1951.Having never graduated from Stanford University, Steinbecks life for the approximately part was low profile even after the publishing of his first books, Cup of Gold (1929), The Pastures of paradise and To a God Unknown, which were all inadequately acknowledged by the literary world. Tortilla Flat (1935) was the noniceable turning point i n Steinbecks literary career receiving the California Commonwealth Clubs Gold Medal for best fiction. Steinbeck act writing, and The Grapes of Wrath (1939) won him the Pulitzer Prize. The Nobel Prize was awarded to John Steinbeck for Literature in 1962 for his realistic as well as imaginative writings, distinguished by a sympathetic humor and a keen social perception. 1 Twenty-nine Academy Award nominations and four Academy Awards were given for revision of John Steinbecks stories.Literature helpless one of its most accomplished and distinguished writers on December 20, 1968, in New York City John Steinbeck died at the age of 66. However, on a to a greater extent positive note, New York City was also the carry where literature bore Robert Ludlum. Ludlum can be described as a modern day author. He is a well-known author writing twenty-one novels and selling over 290 million books in thirty-two different languages. Ludlum started his literary career relatively late because he was working in1. Mobel Lectures literature 1901-4967the orbit as an actor and producer. One of the primary reasons Ludlum is such a suspenseful writer is due to the position that he was born in an age where movies grabbed the attention of the public eye. In the 1950s, Ludlum worked as a tip and television actor. After producing 300 stage productions for New York and regional theatre, Ludlum wrote his first novel, The Scarlatti Inheritance (1971). Few writers are able to grasp global attention using unbelievable dapples that spin into engrossing tales.John Steinbeck and Robert Ludlum are comparable writers. These two authors are very accomplished and their novels reputations speak for themselves. John Steinbecks Of Mice and Men and Robert Ludlums The Bourne Identity are the focus of this evaluation. Their works signify literary techniques that contribute to theme. The central theme in Of Mice and Men written by John Steinbeck human fates are constantly controlled by out location for ces. The techniques he uses for showcase repetition and symbolic representation are extremely successful in getting across his very cynical views on this theme. Similar techniques are apply in Robert Ludlums The Bourne Identity. Uniquely writing many of Ludlums techniques are present in his writing, but the reviewer is too engrossed in the story to recognize them. However, Ludlum writes meticulously in his story plots. When evaluated, the reader can distinguish that repetition and symbolism are also used as literary techniques that contribute to theme.Steinbeck and Ludlum use the technique of repetition to effectively build up the cease of the tragedy. In Of Mice and Men, Lennie unintentionally killed his mouse when petting it. This situation repeats itself further in the novel when Slim gives Lennie a puppy. When playing with the animal, Lennie gave the puppy a disciplining thump for biting him and he killed it. An incident, such as this, impart be the downfall of George and L ennie. Near the end of the novel, Lennie strokes Curleys wifes hair.He holds too tightly and she gets frightened. Lennie was in a panic. 2 Climaxing, he attempts to quiet her, Dont you go yellin, he say, and he shook her, and her body flopped like a fish. And then she was still, for Lennie had scummy her neck. 2 The repetition of unintentional death foreshadows a negative outcome for Lennie, his sealed fate. This action brought upon his own murder by George who shot him in the back of the head out of mercy for everything else that was weak and helpless. In this act of violence, George would not be considered a murderer, in fact, quite the opposite. George, instead, would be deemed a savor because he did Lennie a favor.2. Steinbeck 91The Bourne Identity uses repetition in a similar fashion. The central quotation Jason Bourne faces memory loss, crippling him from discovering his true identity. His instincts and intelligence help guide him. The quote You are not helpless. You will f ind your way. 3 is repeated on several occasions, which foreshadows success on Jasons behalf. Jasons rhetorical demeanor when faced with stressful and difficult situations ends in same violent manner. Bourne grabbed the Frenchman in front of him now, his left arm around the mans throat, his right hand tearing at the mans left ear. 4 Without thinking, Jason reacts to the situation with equilibrise and precision. Jasons rhetorical skills evoke his memory enough to enable him to think and act on his own to distract death or capture. Whenever you observe a stress-and you have the time-do your damndest to project into it. Associate as freely as you can let words and images fill your mind. In them you may find clues.5 This quote is well-nigh repeated again, Whenever youre in a stress situation-and theres time, of course-do exactly as you would when you project yourself into one youre observing. Let your mind fall free, let whatever thoughts and images that surface come cleanly. Try not to exercise any noetic discipline. Be a sponge c at one timentrate on everything and nothing. Specifics may come to you, certain repressed conduits electrical energy prodded into functioning. 6 except there is added tactics, which suggests that Jason is constantly learning. Through repetition Jason persistently advances his skills to obtain his past by varying his appearance, Change your hairyou change your face.7 Soon after his skills advanced, Jason learned that his real name is David Webb who turns out as a young Far East scholar. Webb received a new identity from the central intelligence (CIA) as Jason Bourne, a black ops agent. His primary objective was to kill Carlos, another far more advanced bravo, but was betrayed. As the plot twists, the CIA has given Jason quite a few hoops to brook through for his own survival. The climax builds to this particular moment in the novel, when Jason reverses the situation and uses the training the CIA gave him to kill the assassin Carlos . The climax appears to have truth because not only has Jason stopped being on the defensive side of this live or die game, but also his proficient skills have bony him to his past business to kill or be killed fate. The interfering CIA has lost control of Bourne however he is move back to his past line of work, which could result in death, so he ultimately loses. It could be said that Jason Bourne was born to be a professional assassin under anyones control.3. Ludlum 39, 43, 834. Ludlum 645. Ludlum 506. Ludlum 827. Ludlum 116, 161Another technique that demonstrates John Steinbecks view of fate is the symbolism. Near the end of the novel, A watersnake glided swimmingly up the pool, twisting its periscope head from side to side, and it swam the length of the pool and came to the legs of a motionless heron that stood in the shallows. A silent head and beak lanced down and plucked it out by the head, and the beak swallowed the fine snake while its tail waved frantically. 8 The her on, stationary and patient, typifys fate, while the watersnake, vulnerable and unaware, its victim. The watersnake would most likely symbolize George. Not only does the Heron symbolize fate, it also symbolizes Lennie the burden to their dream.Steinbeck illustrates his view on fate once more by word choice. Words like lanced, plucked, and waiting suggest that Steinbeck believes that fate strikes assertively and specifically. Similarly, Robert Ludlum uses symbolism to project the same idea. Symbolism appears not as evident as repetition however, present nonetheless. The CIA seems to be the entity or government corporation that symbolizes fate. Every element in the novel can be drawn back to something that the CIA has caused. Ludlum and Steinbeck believe fate to be all the same. In Ludlums case, the CIAs intricate plans and organized operations fit Steinbecks idea that fate acts in the same manner, assertively and specifically.Of Mice and Men and The Bourne Identity are literally wr itten in identical fashions. Steinbeck and Ludlum use character driven dialogue to tell the story. The point-of-views transpose mingled with first person (the main characters) and third person (the narrator). The first person prospective uniquely projects to the reader each of the character thoughts and actions. The first person prospective gives a clear understanding of what exactly will happen, without all of the excess narration. However, the narration does an excellent job in describing the setting among other elements, such as flow between events. The events or chapters are present in both novels. Ludlum uses three books within his novel along with thirty phoebe bird chapters because The Bourne Identity is far longer than the six chapters Of Mice and Men.This technique is unmistakable for the sole purpose of changing locations in the story with ease in The Bourne Identity Jason and his abetter _or_ abettor travel to different countries, and in Of Mice and Men the only chan ge of location appears within the town and ranch. These two books were written very similarly. Both switched between first and third person depending on what the best way to tell the story was. By changing point of views, Ludlum and Steinbeck were able to develop their themes more thoroughly. The technique of changing perspectives allowed the reader to identify with the main characters, but at the same time, know vital information that would be needed to understand the story.8. Steinbeck 99Robert Ludlum and John Steinbeck are exceptional authors. There novels The Bourne Identity and Of Mice and Men, respectively, have Robert Lattas praise. Woohoo, right? There are more positive, than negative, statements to be discussed. Particularly, Ludlums story is far more intriguing than Steinbecks. The plot and characters all are attention getters. The idea that a man with no memory has instincts that are supra any normal man, and has answers to every question, except his name, is fascinating. The only downfall to Ludlums work appears to be the length of his novel, five hundred some odd pages, that turns out to be a lot of reading time.Steinbecks novel length however, fits the taste well, only one hundred some pages. The olden story in Steinbecks novel, gets negative feedback because its good plot stimulated nothing more than closing eye lids. Praising the literary device of repetition, this gave some indication that what was being read over again would prove useful in assembling a critical evaluation essay. The repetition also forces the information into your brain, meaning it holds significance. Moreover, the theme portrayed among these two novels had some relevance with our current lives, which also served another purpose to reading them Overall, the novels ended up balancing one another. A positive recommendation can be made for both these novels because something can be learned. industrial plant CITEDLectures, Mobel. The Nobel Prize in Literature 1962. online http/ /www.nobel.se/literature/laureates/1962/press.htmlLudlum, Robert. The Bourne Identity. New York Richard Marek, 1975Steinbeck, John. Of Mice and Men. New York Penguin Books, 1978